User talk:Timvasquez

Shiny

Nice image on Baffin Island, thanks. foobaz·✐ 02:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Image:AL-OBSX.jpg

Do you have any information on where Image:AL-OBSX.jpg comes from. It's being discussed at WP:IS. Please let us know there. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk)

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article urushiol-induced contact dermatitis, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently-created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Arctic Island's map

Great map. Can I ask what tool you used? Is it a Mercator projection? -- Geo Swan 04:27, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Msyelevst.jpg

You haven't edited Wikipedia for a while, so I'm sending you a copy of this message through two e-mail addresses I found on your sites. Someone has noted that one of the maps you posted on Wikipedia, Image:Msyelevst.jpg, contains some inaccuracies as to the labels of the place names ("It shows the 9th Ward in New Orleas East and Arabi is shown where the 9th Ward actually is" was an example someone gave). Do you have an updated or corrected version of this map, or would you be interested in making a corrected version?

Thank you!

The exact comment that was made is available here: Talk:Effect_of_Hurricane_Katrina_on_New_Orleans#Flood_Elevations_Map (Please don't take the comment personally if you feel it's rude.)

I hope you can continue to help contribute! --AySz88 ^-^ 03:33, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I added some more notes at the same discussion. I'd noticed some problems with name placements as well, but mostly I was impressed that you can make such maps; we can use more good maps! If you can reccomend programs for creating such maps, or would be willing to take suggestions for an improved version, that would be great. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 06:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 July 7

The six military airfield templates that you created are up for deletion as I can't see that they are being used. Please see the above link. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you didn't mind. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Airports

Greetings! While going over the change log in assessments for WikiProject Airports, I noticed that you had created Krasnoyarsk Yemelyanovo Airport. Your help is very much appreciated. I'd like to invite you to join the WikiProject, if you feel so inclined. You can find the participants subpage either from the navigation panel on the right side of all our project pages or simply by going to WP:AIRPORTS/P. Thanks! thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 00:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't suppose you gave the project any more though? We'd still love to have you aboard! thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 21:07, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm not dismissing it at all; my time has been erratic the past few days. I'll take a look this week. Thanks, -Timvasquez 22:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Russian airports

Thanks for your work. Please don't forget to announce new articles on Portal:Russia/New article announcements. Best, Ghirla ^-трёп- 19:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A statement about my Russian airport work

This past week I have been loading up Wikipedia with information on former Soviet and current Russian airports. Oddly enough, Russian aviation infrastructure has been one of many passing hobbies of mine as I've always been interested in the Soviet military. It's always been very easy to find information on Soviet aircraft, but it's hard to find good information on the facilities, so that's where my curiosity has always led. Starting in mid-2005 I sat down and did an exhaustive survey of all the air bases and airports from all of my maps and references (over 1200 of the airfields) and posted them at russianairfields.com. I no longer wish to maintain that site and would like to see the information prosper with the input of anybody, especially since details are always so scarce, so I decided to start offloading the info to Wikipedia and shut down the russianairfields.com website in 2007 or so.

I have decided to limit inclusions to Wikipedia to ONLY paved airfields longer than 1000 meters, unless the airfield is noteworthy in some way. I am also using making use of the tags Russia-mil-stub, euro-airport-stub, and asia-airport-stub; and the categories Soviet Air Force bases, Russian Air Force bases, Soviet Naval Aviation bases, Russian Navy, Airports built in the Soviet Union, and Category:Airports in Russia as appropriate. I am also using the excellent Airport frame.

If you all have any questions about the work, let me know. -Timvasquez 19:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have one. Should the articles not be "Kryuchkovo Airbase" or "Air Base" or "Airfield". Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I considered that, but I have never encountered Soviet airfields that literally contain "Air Base" in the title (at least in the English literature). This seems to be mostly a convention the U.S. Air Force uses for its own bases. In Russia the convention seems to be to use the nearest village name, or in the case of a large city, use a numerical designator, i.e. Severomorsk-2. Quite often they are just referred to as, variously, "Tiksi aerodrome" and "Tiksi air base" (uncapitalized). This is also the convention I see in declassified FOIA documents in the CIA archive website. So if there is ambiguity I use (air base). Hopefully some ex-Soviet servicemembers will fix things where appropriate (a lot of times the numerical airfield designator is unknown). -Timvasquez 17:32, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with those who left mil.service from USSR that we can actually claim but that will be original research, and documents to refer to - they had been left in archives or destroyed. Ex-serviceman a.k.a. silpol (talk) 01:00, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me

I, Alex Bakharev, hereby award you this barnstar for your fine work on the airports article. Keep it up!

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Weselberg.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 17:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Re Oshmyan

Hello, I have noticed that you have created articles about a number of airports in Lithuania. Unfortunately most of them are badly mispelled. I corrected some, but this one puzzles me. Are you sure it's in Lithuania and not Belarus? Because Belarus has a city named Ašmiany... Renata 08:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there may have been a mistake regarding the international boundaries, however the latitude/longitude are correct and should be used to establish the location. As far as misspellings, I welcome the move of any articles to one which uses the correct name. I do recommend that a redirect be added using the original name, since the names were obtained from United States aeronautical charts and many US/UK/Canada users will be looking up the airports under these "Americanized" names. -Timvasquez 05:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mcmansiontexas.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mcmansiontexas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Korn (onomastics)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Korn (onomastics), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Korn (onomastics) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Housekeeping - cleanup per WP:SU

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Korn (onomastics), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Gywo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gywo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 02:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Babyonboard.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Babyonboard.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 11:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:BuildersSquare.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BuildersSquare.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:47, 15 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:47, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Y10view.gif

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Y10view.gif. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 15:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MilitaryAirfield end frame

Hi, I just noticed that a template you created, Template:MilitaryAirfield end frame, is unused and appears to be abandoned. I've marked it as deprecated, meaning it'll be deleted in two weeks' time if nobody objects. If there's a reason to keep it please leave a note at Wikipedia talk:Deprecated and orphaned templates. Thanks. Bryan Derksen 02:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rtishchevo (air base)

Hi! I am just curious what information source was used for this article. Can you provide me with this information, please? The information will then be used for adding in ru:Ртищево. Thank you very much in advance. --Michael Romanov 00:37, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Timvasquez's last edit was February 2007. If you take a look at the 'Statement' note above, you'll see the information was mostly from U.S. government charts etc. Happy editing, Buckshot06 (talk) 04:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Honeycombhideout.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Honeycombhideout.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Incrediblystrangecreatures.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Incrediblystrangecreatures.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chuguevka.jpg to Commons please

Hello,

Will you upload the Chuguevka.jpg image to Commons, please? I wish to use it in the Hungarian Wikipedia. (there is no legal problem as the picture is in the public domain). Thanks in advance. --Misibacsi (talk) 19:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 05:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Pevek.jpg

File:Pevek.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Airport Pevek satellite.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Airport Pevek satellite.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:39, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Timvasquez! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Slava Tsukerman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sawing off of Manhattan Island

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Sawing off of Manhattan Island. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sawing off of Manhattan Island. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FortWint.gif needs authorship information.

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:FortWint.gif appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:{{subst:usernameexpand|Timvasquez}} will produce an appropriate expansion,

or the {{own}} template..

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:33, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for File:Tiksi-Aerodrom.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tiksi-Aerodrom.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?Badzil (talk) 11:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belgorod.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Belgorod.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:44, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ush Tobe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ush Tobe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ush Tobe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 02:05, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Klimovo (air base) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Klimovo (air base) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klimovo (air base) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anup Mehra ^✈ 17:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Msyelevst.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Msyelevst.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sandy Frank for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandy Frank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Frank until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boson (talk) 16:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Timvasquez. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dikson Airport for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dikson Airport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dikson Airport until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anadyr.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anadyr.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 18:07, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mackenziekingisland.png

The file File:Mackenziekingisland.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Devonisland.png

The file File:Devonisland.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Stefanssonisland.png

The file File:Stefanssonisland.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Krasnoyarsk.jpg

The file File:Krasnoyarsk.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very poor quality

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krapivnya

The article Krapivnya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced article about a non notable airfield

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mbdfar (talk) 22:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iul'tin Airport for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iul'tin Airport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iul'tin Airport until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 03:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Okhtyrka Air Base for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Okhtyrka Air Base is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okhtyrka Air Base until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 23:46, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Altovis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Altovis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altovis (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

US-Verified (talk) 12:52, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Soviet Air Force bases

A tag has been placed on Category:Soviet Air Force bases indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:41, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jonava Air Base

The article Jonava Air Base has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail WP:NGEO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krasnovishersk Airport

The article Krasnovishersk Airport has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails notability completely.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jaguarnik (talk) 22:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]