Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Broken code in blue "Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents" box

At the bottom of it:

Closed discussions are usually not archived for at least 24 hours. Routine matters might be archived more quickly; complex or controversial matters should remain longer. Sections inactive for 72 hours are archived automatically by Lowercase sigmabot III. Editors unable to edit here are sent to the /Non-autoconfirmed posts subpage.

|- | class="plainlinks" style="border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; background: var(--color-inverted, #fff); text-align: center; font-size: 125%;" | Start a new discussion

Pretty sure the "|- | class= " etc. bit isn't supposed to be there. -The Bushranger One ping only 04:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Bushranger: I think I fixed it. Jip Orlando (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Wikipedia:REPORT to the page Wikipedia:Wikipedia only reports what the sources say has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 19 § Wikipedia:REPORT until a consensus is reached. 67.209.129.48 (talk) 10:52, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about TPA and UTRS notification following TPA removal

Your feedback would be appreciated at WT:Blocking policy#Questions about TPA and UTRS notification following TPA removal. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 22:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Transphobia from User:DarwIn

Some editors from the Portuguese-language Wikipedia have expressed that they cannot question anything in articles about LGBTQ personalities without being accused of prejudice. Thus, by agreeing (even partially) with the topic opened by Skyshifter, one of the main accounts from this group, you from the English-language Wikipedia are, in a way, endorsing this destabilizing conduct.

The objective of the topic seems so evident that, as soon as it was questioned by Yamla on December 29, 2024, Skyshifter already mentioned the conflict on the Portuguese-language Wikipedia.

Although I do not take away your right to debate any issue, several editors from the Portuguese-language Wikipedia have approached me to classify your decision as interference in another community.

Skyshifter has merits as an editor, but has a history of destabilizing actions that led to their ban on the pt.wiki. This account set the bait, and you from the English-language Wikipedia easily fell for it.

My ironic congratulations! Edmond Dantès d'un message? 14:12, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The actions taken against DarwIn were due to their comportment here on En.Wp. They have nobody to blame but themself if this has been disruptive at pt.wp. Simonm223 (talk) 14:15, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]